Obesity is associated with a higher incidence of rejection in patients on belatacept: A pooled analysis from the BENEFIT/BENEFIT-EXT clinical trials.

Though belatacept is administered with a weight-based dosing schema, there has been higher clearance reported in obese patients. Therefore, we evaluated the association between body mass index (BMI) and transplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients who were randomized to cyclosporine- or belatacept-based immunosuppression in the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT randomized clinical trials. A total of 666 and 543 patients underwent randomization and transplantation in BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, respectively, of which 1056 had complete data and were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped categorically according to BMI: <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30 kg/m2. BMI did influence both the incidence and severity of acute rejection. Obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 in the low intensity belatacept group experienced significantly more rejection at 12 months than did patients with BMI <25 kg/m2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2. In both the moderate intensity belatacept and low intensity belatacept groups, obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 experienced significantly more severe acute rejection than did patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2. These results suggest that obese kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk for acute rejection when under belatacept-based immunosuppression when compared to nonobese patients.

Impact of peri-operative red blood cell transfusions for treatment of anemia on acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Anemia occurs before and after kidney transplantation. Determining the impact of perioperative transfusion on post-transplant outcomes can help determine best management of anemia. PROJECT AIM: The current study aims to describe clinical outcomes associated with packed red blood cell transfusions in the peri-operative management of anemia after transplantation. DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult kidney recipients with anemia at the time of transplantation. 1271 patients were stratified by donor-type due to the potential variability in underlying recipient and transplant characteristics; living donor (n = 698, 62%) or deceased donor (n = 573, 38%). RESULTS: Living donor recipients that received blood during the index hospitalization were more likely to experience rejection within 30 days (18% vs. 10%, p = 0.008) and 1 year of transplant (32% vs. 16%, p = 0.038). In multivariate analysis, receiving both blood and darbepoetin (HR: 1.89 [1.20,3.00], p = 0.006), age at transplant (HR: 0.98 [0.97, 0.99], p = 0.02), number of HLA mismatches (HR: 1.17 [1.05,1.30], p = 0.003), and whether the case was a repeat transplant (HR: 2.77 [1.93,3.97], p < 0.01) were significantly associated with hazard of rejection. For deceased donor recipients, there were no differences in acute rejection, graft failure or mortality at 30 days or 1 year. When analyzing hazard of rejection in a multivariate model, treatment received was not found to be significantly associated with rejection. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest there may be a role for more aggressive pre-transplant treatment of anemia for those patients undergoing living donor transplants.

Bivalirudin Compared to Heparin as the Primary Anticoagulant in Pediatric Berlin Heart Recipients.

Bivalirudin has been used in increasing frequency as an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in pediatric recipients of Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist devices (VAD). This single-center, retrospective review characterizes anticoagulant trends and outcomes in pediatric Berlin Heart VAD recipients implanted between September 1, 2013, and August 31, 2021, anticoagulated with either bivalirudin or UFH. Thirty-one patients were included; 65% who received bivalirudin and 35% who received UFH. The median age was 2.9 years, included 64.5% females, with 61.3% of patients diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy and 25.8% of patients with congenital heart disease. Therapeutic anticoagulation was achieved sooner in the bivalirudin group compared to UFH via anti-Xa monitoring (median 5.7 and 69.5 hours, respectively, p < 0.001). Bivalirudin had a greater number of therapeutic values comparatively to UFH (52% and 24%, respectively; p < 0.001) and a superior number of hours in the therapeutic range (67% and 32%, respectively; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were similar among the two groups, apart from greater chest tube output (UFH), more frequent events of elevated plasma-free hemoglobin (bivalirudin), and more frequent elevated inflammatory markers postimplant (bivalirudin). Prevalence of pump replacements secondary to significant clot burden and prevalence of stroke was comparable. In this patient cohort, bivalirudin demonstrated greater anticoagulation stability comparatively to UFH. Multicenter collaboration would be necessary to identify whether this further translates into improved patient outcomes.

Elevated posaconazole trough concentrations are not associated with increased risk for posaconazole toxicity in lung transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Posaconazole is used for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in lung transplant recipients (LTR). Previous studies have not described the relationship between elevated posaconazole trough concentrations and adverse drug reactions in this population. METHODS: This IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital included LTR who had posaconazole trough concentrations measured. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate elevated posaconazole trough concentrations and changes in liver function tests as well as QTc interval. A secondary aim of this study was to identify patient factors associated with elevated posaconazole trough levels. RESULTS: A total of 109 LTR were included. The average age was 58.1 years (IQR, 48-65), the majority were male (56%). A total of 932 trough levels were assessed with a median number of 8 (IQR, 5-15) levels per patient. The median posaconazole trough concentration was 1.7 mg/L (IQR, 1.1-2.5). Hepatotoxicity, as defined by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), was observed in 73.4% of subjects, with the majority classified as grade 1 (67.5%). However, there was no correlation between elevated posaconazole levels and aspartate aminotransferase (r = .03), alanine aminotransferase (r = .04), alkaline phosphatase (r = .04), and total bilirubin (r = .02). There was also no correlation between posaconazole trough concentrations and QTc interval (r = .03). CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that no correlation exists between whole blood posaconazole levels and hepatotoxicity or QTc prolongation. Based on these results, posaconazole dose reductions may not be warranted for posaconazole levels that are significantly above the therapeutic target to avert risk for hepatotoxicity or QTc prolongation.

Pre-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Rituximab for Epstein-Barr Virus and Post-Lymphoproliferative Disorder Prophylaxis in Alemtuzumab Recipients.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation and EBV-related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are often fatal complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The risk of EBV reactivation may be mitigated by depletion of B cells with rituximab. Starting in January 2020, allo-HSCT recipients undergoing T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab received 1 dose of rituximab before transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD in recipients of allo-HSCT and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab who received pre-HSCT rituximab compared to patients who did not. This was a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients who consecutively received an HLA-identical allo-HSCT between January 2019 and May 2021 and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab. Patients were included in the rituximab cohort if they received rituximab within 6 months before their transplantation. The primary endpoint was incidence of EBV reactivation at day 180 among those receiving pre-HSCT rituximab versus those not receiving rituximab. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of EBV-PTLD at 1 year, time to engraftment, immune reconstitution, and incidence of infections and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at day 180. Eighty-six consecutive patients who received an allo-HSCT with alemtuzumab T-cell depletion were reviewed; 43 patients who received pre-HSCT rituximab after our protocol modification were compared to 43 patients who did not receive pre-HSCT rituximab before this change. Median age was 57 (interquartile range [IQR] 40-69) years, and the majority of patients had acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Baseline characteristics were similar between the cohorts. EBV reactivation at day 180 occurred in 23 (53%) patients without prior rituximab exposure versus 0 patients with pre-HSCT rituximab exposure (P < .0001). Similarly, 6 patients without prior rituximab exposure developed PTLD at 1 year compared to no cases of PTLD among patients receiving pre-HSCT rituximab. There was no difference in neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, or aGVHD at day 180 between the 2 cohorts. There was a delay in time to platelet engraftment in the rituximab cohort (median 16 [IQR 15-20] days versus 15 [IQR 14-17] days; P = .04). Administration of pre-HSCT rituximab before allo-HSCT in patients receiving T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab was associated with a significant decrease in the risk for EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD, without increasing aGVHD or infection rates.

Immune cell function assay and T lymphocyte counts lack association with rejection or infection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Immune cell function assay (ICFA) and CD3 lymphocyte counts have been considered to be useful in discerning the overall intensity of immunosuppression in pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. METHODS: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate trends of ICFA and CD3 lymphocyte counts and their association with adverse outcomes post-OHT. RESULTS: A total of 381 ICFA and 493 CD3 laboratory values obtained in 78 patients within six months post-OHT were analyzed. There were 14 patients treated for biopsy-proven acute rejection, four of whom had ISHLT grade 2R/3A rejection. In patients with rejection versus those without, CD3 and ICFA values were 122 (IQR 74.5-308) cells/mm2 and 224.5 (IQR 132-343.5) ng/ml compared to 231.8 (IQR 68-421) cells/m2 and 191 (IQR 81.5-333) ng/mL (p = NS for both). Twenty-six patients had at least one detectable cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia within the study timeframe. In patients with viremia versus those without, CD3 and ICFA values were 278.5 (IQR 68-552) cells/mm2 and 130 (IQR 48-284) ng/ml compared to 195 (IQR 74.5-402.5) cells/mm2 and 212 (IQR 89-342) ng/ml (p = NS for both). CONCLUSIONS: No association was found between these immune markers and adverse outcomes. In the absence of larger pediatric studies justifying the role of these tests in identifying elevated risk profiles post OHT, we do not recommend their routine use.

COVID-19 therapeutics and outcomes among solid organ transplant recipients during the Omicron BA.1 era.

Treatment outcomes associated with the use of novel COVID-19 therapeutics in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are not well described in the literature. The objective of this analysis was to characterize 30-day hospitalization and other key secondary endpoints experienced by outpatient SOTR with mild-moderate COVID-19 treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR), sotrovimab, or no SARS-CoV-2 specific treatment. This IRB-approved, retrospective study included 154 SOTR with a documented positive SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 16, 2021 and January 19, 2022 (a predominant Omicron BA.1 period in New York City). Patients who received NR (N = 28) or sotrovimab (N = 51) experienced a lower rate of 30-day hospitalization or death as compared to those who received no specific treatment (N = 75) (p = .009). A total of three deaths occurred, all among patients who initially received no specific treatment prior to hospitalization. These results suggest a role for SARS-CoV-2 specific agents in the treatment of SOTR with COVID-19, and that there does not appear to be any difference in effectiveness when comparing NR versus sotrovimab.

Early clinical experience with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) use has not yet been described in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with mild COVID-19. The objective was to evaluate outcomes among SOTR and describe the drug-drug interaction of NR. This is an IRB-approved, retrospective study of all adult SOTR on a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor who were prescribed NR between December 28, 2021 and January 6, 2022. A total of 25 adult SOTR were included (n = 21 tacrolimus, n = 4 cyclosporine, n = 3 everolimus, n = 1 sirolimus). All patients were instructed to follow the following standardized protocol during treatment with 5 days of NR: hold tacrolimus or mTOR inhibitor or reduce cyclosporine dose to 20% of baseline daily dose. Four patients (16%) were hospitalized by day 30; one for infectious diarrhea and three for symptoms related to COVID-19. No patients died within 30 days of receipt of NR. Median tacrolimus level pre- and post-NR were 7.4 ng/ml (IQR, 6.6-8.6) and 5.2 (IQR, 3.6-8.7), respectively. Four patients experienced a supratherapeutic tacrolimus concentration after restarting tacrolimus post-NR. Our results show the clinically significant interaction between NR and immunosuppressive agents can be reasonably managed with a standardized dosing protocol. Prescribers should carefully re-introduce CNI after the NR course is complete.

Comparing weight-based dosing of tacrolimus XR in obese and non-obese renal transplant recipients.

The recommended initial weight-based dose of extended-release (XR) tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is 0.14 mg/kg/day. However, no data exist regarding dosing recommendations for obese patients specifically. The aim of this study was to evaluate weight-based dosing requirements in a cohort of obese KTR who were initiated on de novo tacrolimus XR post-transplantation. The primary outcome was weight-based dosing requirements (mg/kg/day) on post-operative day (POD) 7 and 14. Of the 254 KTR, 81 (31%) were obese. The median therapeutic dose on POD7 was 0.1 versus 0.12 vs. 0.14 mg/kg/day in the BMI > 30 kg/m2 , BMI 25-30 kg/m2 , and BMI < 25 kg/m2 , respectively, (p = .0001). This result was similar on POD14; median therapeutic dose was 0.09 versus 0.11 versus 0.15 mg/kg/day in the BMI > 30 kg/m2 , BMI 25-30 kg/m2 , and BMI < 25 kg/m2 , respectively, (p < .001). Therapeutic dose on POD7 and POD14 based on ideal body was similar in all cohorts (p = .238, p = .923, respectively). This finding was supported by a strong linear relationship between ideal body weight (IBW) and therapeutic dose (r = .929). In both obese and non-obese KTR, IBW had a stronger correlation with the therapeutic dose for tacrolimus XR.

The Safety and Efficacy of Desmopressin in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage and a History of Alcohol Use.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of alcohol use disorder are at an increased risk of hematoma expansion following intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) due to the effects of alcohol on platelet aggregation. Desmopressin (DDAVP) improves platelet aggregation and may decrease hematoma expansion in patients with ICH. However, DDAVP may also increase the risk of hyponatremia and thrombotic events. Evidence is limited regarding the safety and efficacy of DDAVP in alcohol use (AU)-associated ICH. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients with radiographic evidence of ICH and a confirmed or suspected history of alcohol use upon admission. Patients were categorized into groups based on DDAVP administration. Safety outcomes included hyponatremia (serum sodium <135 mEq/L or decrease in serum sodium of ≥ 5 mEq/L for patients with baseline sodium <135 mEq/L) within 24 hours of ICH and thrombotic events within 7 days of ICH. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of hematoma expansion, defined as any expansion of the hemorrhage noted on repeat imaging within 32 hours. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients were included in the safety analysis (27 DDAVP and 25 non-DDAVP). Although hyponatremia was numerically higher in the DDAVP group, there was no significant difference between groups (19.2% vs 4.2%, P = 0.192). Thrombotic complications were similar between the DDAVP and non-DDAVP groups (11.1% vs. 8%, P = 1.0). Thirty-nine patients met criteria for hemostatic efficacy analysis. There was no difference in hematoma expansion between the DDAVP and non-DDAVP groups (23.1% vs 34.6%, P = 0.71) and these findings were consistent after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.1-3.3). CONCLUSION: The administration of DDAVP was not associated with adverse safety events, but did not significantly reduce the incidence of hematoma expansion in patients with AU-associated ICH.